Jost.el Logfile

Jost.el Logfile

From: andre.karwath@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
Newsgroups: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Web Design mit LINUX ?
Date: 27 Jul 1999 23:57:36 GMT
Message-ID: <slrn7pshrg.gdo.andre.karwath@max.aka.de>

Jost Bloekemeier wrote:

>Daran erkennt man, dass Du noch nie programmiert hast.  Wer bei
>der Entwicklung von Programmen die Standard IDE (also gud, etags,
>cc-mode ignoriert, dem ist wirklich nicht mehr zu helfen).

Auf noch nicht geklaerte Weise hat mich der zu obigem Posting
gehoerende Logdateieintrag des den Artikel erzeugenden Programmes
erreicht (ich habe nur die Zeitangabe links entfernt):

commandline is: "jost.el /var/spool/news/"
checking program name to decide in which mode to operate  ... jost
     note: this is a  beta version, only the following modes are currently
           available: "jost", "adam"
     dumping settings for mode "jost":
          overall intelligence: 92 %
          show intelligence:    27 %
          spelling ability:     98 %
          grammar ability:      95 %
          semantics ability:    12 %
          ignorance:            96 %
          typing ability:       82 %
          quoting ability:      74 %
          coolness:             unset - WARNING: please correct this setting
initializing random number generator ... OK
searching new articles ... OK - 749 articles found
selecting three random articles ... OK
processing article 1 ...
     message id: <37a16799.30985056@news.uni-leipzig.de>
checking article language ... German
     dicing whether to answer in German too ... yes
     dicing whether to fulfil general usenet rules ... yes
     dicing whether to create a RFC-conform message ... yes
     dicing whether to append simply a short answer like "Du spinnst!" ... no
     creating a random answer message ... 25%..50%..75%..100% - OK
     the following answer message has been created:
          "Daran erkennt man, dass Du noch nie programmiert hast.  Wer bei
          der Entwicklung von Programmen die Standard IDE (also gud, etags,
          cc-mode ignoriert, dem ist wirklich nicht mehr zu helfen)."
     quick-checking answer message ...
          missing words "Emacs" and "LaTeX"
     quick-check result: problems found, executing deep check
     deep-checking answer message ...
          formation check: error in paragraph 1, sentence 1/2
                               additional space found
          spelling check:  error in paragraph 1, sentence 2:
                               missing "-"
                           warning in paragraph 1, sentence 2:
                               unknown word "gud"
          grammar check:   error in paragraph 1, sentence 2:
                               uncomplete sentence
          semantics check: critical error found - whole paragraph affected
          self-modifying module "create_answer_message" to avoid this/these
          mistake(s) in the future ...
                           formating ... OK
                           spelling ... OK
                           grammar ... OK
                           semantics ... ERROR - the semantics module does
                                         not allow code modifications
                                         hey, all joking aside! - please
                                         remove this crazy write protection
          critical errors found in paragraph 1 - further checks aborted
     result for article 1: errors found, posting aborted
processing article 2 ...
     checking article lanugage ... Suaheli - no dictionary available
     checking article lanugage ... Suaheli - no dictionary available
     checking article lanugage ... Suaheli - no dictionary available
     got signal 2 - ignored
     checking article lanugage ... Suaheli - no dictionary available
     got signal 15 - no, I do not think so - ignored
     checking article lanugage ... Suaheli - no dictionary available
     KILLED ...

Das ist ja schoen und gut so. Nur, warum wird der Artikel trotz
fehlgeschlagenem Sicherheitscheck gepostet? Einen Bugreport an den
Programmierer hab' ich schonmal abgeschickt - aka "Leider ist das kein
Einzelfall."

> This article has been automatically created by aka.pl. <